[asterisk-users] [UK SPECIFIC] DAHDI and a OpenVox Card
Gordon Henderson
gordon+asterisk at drogon.net
Fri May 1 11:13:50 CDT 2009
On Fri, 1 May 2009, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
> Okay, getting somewhere now ! I am now getting the following :-
>
> == Starting post polarity CID detection on channel 1
> -- Starting simple switch on 'DAHDI/1-1'
> [May 1 12:03:10] NOTICE[4360]: chan_dahdi.c:7669 ss_thread: MWI: Channel 1 message waiting!
> -- Executing [s at inbound-dahdi:1] Answer("DAHDI/1-1", "") in new stack
> -- Executing [s at inbound-dahdi:2] Ringing("DAHDI/1-1", "") in new stack
> -- Executing [s at inbound-dahdi:3] Wait("DAHDI/1-1", "1") in new stack
> -- Executing [s at inbound-dahdi:4] Playback("DAHDI/1-1", "home-message") in new stack
> -- <DAHDI/1-1> Playing 'home-message.gsm' (language 'en')
> -- Executing [s at inbound-dahdi:5] Hangup("DAHDI/1-1", "") in new stack
> == Spawn extension (inbound-dahdi, s, 5) exited non-zero on 'DAHDI/1-1'
> -- Hungup 'DAHDI/1-1'
>
> The problem is that I never actually here the message playback. On the dialling phone I just hear it keep ringing. My test dialplan is as follows :-
>
> [inbound-dahdi]
> exten => s,1,Answer()
> exten => s,n,Ringing()
> exten => s,n,Wait(1)
> exten => s,n,Playback(home-message)
> exten => s,n,Hangup()
I put that in mine and get:
== Starting post polarity CID detection on channel 4
-- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/4-1'
-- Executing Answer("Zap/4-1", "") in new stack
-- Executing Ringing("Zap/4-1", "") in new stack
-- Executing Wait("Zap/4-1", "1") in new stack
-- Executing Playback("Zap/4-1", "tt-ferrets") in new stack
-- Playing 'tt-ferrets' (language 'en')
-- Executing Hangup("Zap/4-1", "") in new stack
== Spawn extension (incoming-zap-ddi, s, 5) exited non-zero on 'Zap/4-1'
-- Hungup 'Zap/4-1'
Personally I'd not put in the Ringing(), but it's doing no harm here...
Looks like it's almost there - barring bugs in the dahdi code, but there
must be 1000's of people out there using it with TDM400 cards or clones...
The differences between UK and US lines are minimal give or take a line
reversal, but who knows...
Gordon
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list