[asterisk-users] Internal timing under load is critical ?

Matthew Jordan mjordan at digium.com
Wed Jul 30 22:37:18 CDT 2014


On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 8:33 PM, Steve Edwards <asterisk.org at sedwards.com>
wrote:

<snip>


> which timing module you are using: res_timing_timerfd.so or
> res_timing_kqueue.so or res_timing_dahdi.sores_timing_pthread.so
>
> I used res_timing_timerfd.so. I'm finally making the leap from 1.2 to the
> current decade :) I read somewhere that this was the timer to use and it
> seems to be working fine for me.
>

Welcome to the current decade! Glad to hear Asterisk 11 is working out okay
for you so far. 1.2 to 11 is a big leap.

FWIW, the Asterisk wiki has a run down on timing interfaces and which ones
are preferred:

https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Timing+Interfaces

For those who want the cliff's notes version, it is:
* res_timing_timerfd
* res_timing_kqueue (where available)
* res_timing_dahdi
* res_timing_pthread

In particular, res_timing_pthread should only be used as a last resort.

-- 
Matthew Jordan
Digium, Inc. | Engineering Manager
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: http://digium.com & http://asterisk.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20140730/7d8dfab5/attachment.html>


More information about the asterisk-users mailing list