[asterisk-users] Fundemental changes to CDR within single asterisk family
ish at pack-net.co.uk
Wed Apr 24 08:22:31 CDT 2013
On Wed, 2013-04-24 at 12:48 +0100, Steve Davies wrote:
> On 4 April 2013 09:05, Ishfaq Malik <ish at pack-net.co.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 07:26 -0500, Matthew Jordan wrote:
> > On 03/26/2013 05:22 AM, Ishfaq Malik wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > In asterisk 188.8.131.52, an inbound call that was transferred
> to another
> > > peer would have 2 cdr entries.
> > >
> > > In asterisk 184.108.40.206 this same activity has a single cdr
> > >
> > > This is a rather large and fundamental change to be
> enacting halfway
> > > through a single family branch, was there any reason why
> this happened?
> > > It means we can't upgrade without doing significant extra
> > > and testing.
> > >
> > This was most likely an unintended consequence of some other
> > (most likely dealing with masquerades). Is 220.127.116.11 the
> exact version
> > when the behaviour changed?
> > Just so I'm clear on the scenario, what are the channel
> > involved? Is the transfer initiated via a protocol message
> or via a DTMF
> > feature?
> > Thanks,
> > Matt
> Hi Matt
> Did you ever spot/recreate the change I was referring to?
> "me too" - I can confirm a behaviour change and will go try and pin
> down at what point it happened.
> This may take me a while :(
I raised a bug on this issue
I need to update it with the requested details though.
Ishfaq Malik <ish at pack-net.co.uk>
Department: VOIP Support
Company: Packnet Limited
t: +44 (0)845 004 4994
f: +44 (0)161 660 9825
e: ish at pack-net.co.uk
Registered Address: PACKNET LIMITED, 2A ENTERPRISE HOUSE, LLOYD STREET
SCIENCE PARK, MANCHESTER, M156SE
COMPANY REG NO. 04920552
More information about the asterisk-users