[asterisk-users] Fundemental changes to CDR within single asterisk family

[Steve Davies]

On 4 April 2013 09:05, Ishfaq Malik <ish at pack-net.co.uk> wrote:

> On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 07:26 -0500, Matthew Jordan wrote:
> > On 03/26/2013 05:22 AM, Ishfaq Malik wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > In asterisk 1.8.7.0, an inbound call that was transferred to another
> > > peer would have 2 cdr entries.
> > >
> > > In asterisk 1.8.18.0 this same activity has a single cdr entry.
> > >
> > > This is a rather large and fundamental change to be enacting halfway
> > > through a single family branch, was there any reason why this happened?
> > > It means we can't upgrade without doing significant extra development
> > > and testing.
> > >
> >
> > This was most likely an unintended consequence of some other change
> > (most likely dealing with masquerades). Is 1.8.18.0 the exact version
> > when the behaviour changed?
> >
> > Just so I'm clear on the scenario, what are the channel technologies
> > involved? Is the transfer initiated via a protocol message or via a DTMF
> > feature?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Matt
> >
>
> Hi Matt
>
> Did you ever spot/recreate the change I was referring to?
>
>
>
"me too" - I can confirm a behaviour change and will go try and pin down at
what point it happened.

This may take me a while :(

Steve
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20130424/2adb4413/attachment.htm>