[asterisk-users] res_timing_timerfd.so Vs res_timing_dahdi.so

[satish patel]

Thanks Leif,

I had changed it to res_timing_dahdi and since last few days it seem good. 

-S

> Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 15:48:03 -0400
> From: leif.madsen at asteriskdocs.org
> To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] res_timing_timerfd.so Vs res_timing_dahdi.so
> 
> On 11-05-13 11:39 AM, isrlgb at gmail.com wrote:
> > I haven't tried with timerfd but with timer pthread 1.8 is very unstable 
> > 
> > I think I have seen a post to the list from kevin fleming that the same is for timerfd that there is a nasty bug which they haven't found the reason for yet
> 
> My experience is that you should pretty much always use res_timing_dahdi unless
> you're on a platform on which you can't install DAHDI. You don't need any
> hardware to use timing from DAHDI because timing is generated by the kernel.
> 
> My order of preference for stability is:
> 
> * res_timing_dahdi
> * res_timing_timerfd
> * res_timing pthread
> 
> The timerfd and pthread modules are relatively new, and sometimes people run
> into stability problems while using them. If you can use res_timing_dahdi I
> recommend you do so.
> 
> Leif.
> 
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
>                http://www.asterisk.org/hello
> 
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110516/9e506aaa/attachment.htm>