[asterisk-users] Discussion: Are we ready to leave 1.4 behind?

[Matteo Piazza]

I agree 100%, it's too early.
There is a lot of businnes out of there based on 1.4 (even still 1.2), 
and my feelings is that a lot of people is not going to upgrade the 
asterisk version, they are going to stay with 1.4 for a long time yet.

Also i wanna add another little consideration. Voip is not only a 
software matter, is a Telecomunication matter. And into the 
Telecomunication world the first priority is the reliability and 
reliability and reliability without forget that usually the lifetime of 
a telecomunicaton product is much more than 4 years.

I'm not a code writer so I can't put my effort in maintaince stuff.

I think 1.4 should be open at least for some critical bug like for 
example segmentation fault or memory leack.
Matteo


Il 27/04/2011 21:34, Olle E. Johansson ha scritto:
> Friends,
>
> We have a discussion on asterisk-dev about the maintenance of the 1.4 branch. According to the release plans, support for 1.4 was scheduled to close in April 2011 - basically now. After that, only security patches would be committed. This is already a delay from the original plan published by Russell Bryant.
>
> Unfortunately, I think this is way too early. My feeling and experience is that 1.8 is not ready for production in the environments I work in - large scale installations. Customers are not planning migration and all new installs are still 1.4. Tests we've been doing with 1.8 has failed within just a short time and so badly that customers has not paid me to spend any further time with 1.8.
>
> Last time we went through this process with a LTS release (which we did not know then) it took over one year before we had a stable product to migrate away from 1.2 and jump on the 1.4 track. Hopefully, with the help of community, we can move up to 1.8 late this year or early next year. For me 1.8 is the focus, it's the LTS release.
>
> Not having a supported 1.4 version from the Digium-hosted repositories will mean that we will have to move to separate repositories or branch off from the main track. I already maintain a ton of subversion branches with various patches to 1.4 It takes a lot of time to manage this version that is a fork from the main 1.4 branch. I will soon have to start working with subversion branches for 1.8 to create a compatible version for my customers to test, since most of the patches is not part of 1.8. After a few years of doing this, I know the work involved with managing code myself.
>
> The Digium team wants to go ahead and not support 1.4 any more, I want to keep 1.4 open for normal bug fixes. What do you think?
>
> Kevin proposed that the community maintains the 1.4 branch without support from the Digium team. I don't think that's a good solution, but it may be the only solution.  I haven't got the resources to manage the 1.4 code myself, so I won't step forward as a maintainer if I can't get proper funding. Anyone else out there that has the time and resources to manage the code?
>
> Feel free to send me mail off list if you have ideas or suggestions on how to solve this - or continue the discussion here.
>
> Regards,
> /Olle
>
> PS. Please don't start a discussion about 1.8 quality in this thread, that's a separate issue. I just want to know what you think about closing 1.4 support now. If you want to discuss 1.8 quality, start a new thread. Thanks.
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
>                 http://www.asterisk.org/hello
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>     http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users