[asterisk-users] Possible bug in Hangup() (Asterisk 1.4.x)
Jim Dickenson
dickenson at cfmc.com
Fri Apr 15 09:01:13 CDT 2011
If what you showed is your whole dialplan then none of the i or t or h extensions are going to be executed for a non answered call.
--
Jim Dickenson
mailto:dickenson at cfmc.com
CfMC
http://www.cfmc.com/
On Apr 15, 2011, at 6:46 AM, Vlasis Hatzistavrou wrote:
> Hello Jim,
>
> Thank you for the reply.
>
> The problem is not reading the ${HANGUPCAUSE} or the ${DIALSTATUS}. It is that the Hangup(<cause>) command seems to ignore its argument and just sends a 503 cause to the caller for all unanswered calls no matter what...
>
> Hangup(<cause>) was working as expected in previous versions and I wonder if something was broken along the way that went by unnoticed. I am just asking in the list in case I am missing something too obvious before posting a bug.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Vlasis Hatzistavrou.
>
>
>
> On 15/4/2011 4:22 μμ, Jim Dickenson wrote:
>> My guess is since the call was never answered you should be looking at ${DIALSTATUS}
>
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
> http://www.asterisk.org/hello
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list