[asterisk-users] Possible bug in Hangup() (Asterisk 1.4.x)

Jim Dickenson dickenson at cfmc.com
Fri Apr 15 09:01:13 CDT 2011


If what you showed is your whole dialplan then none of the i or t or h extensions are going to be executed for a non answered call.
-- 
Jim Dickenson
mailto:dickenson at cfmc.com

CfMC
http://www.cfmc.com/



On Apr 15, 2011, at 6:46 AM, Vlasis Hatzistavrou wrote:

> Hello Jim,
> 
> Thank you for the reply.
> 
> The problem is not reading the ${HANGUPCAUSE} or the ${DIALSTATUS}. It is that the Hangup(<cause>) command seems to ignore its argument and just sends a 503 cause to the caller for all unanswered calls no matter what...
> 
> Hangup(<cause>) was working as expected in previous versions and I wonder if something was broken along the way that went by unnoticed. I am just asking in the list in case I am missing something too obvious before posting a bug.
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Vlasis Hatzistavrou.
> 
> 
> 
> On 15/4/2011 4:22 μμ, Jim Dickenson wrote:
>> My guess is since the call was never answered you should be looking at ${DIALSTATUS}
> 
> 
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
>              http://www.asterisk.org/hello
> 
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




More information about the asterisk-users mailing list