[asterisk-users] Asterisk + Monitor() Poor quality

[Kim Delevati]

Doesnt WAV49 have worse quality than WAV? Or am I wrong?

On more info, I've tested it on calls using alaw, gsm, g729, and in all the
recording has poor quality.

Tzafrir answered me talking about a debian patch for this issue, does anyone
know where to find it?

2009/10/6 Danny Nicholas <danny at debsinc.com>

>  I doubt AGI is the issue.  You can verify this by setting up a context to
> record a call without AGI.  I’d try using the WAV49 format instead of
> regular WAV.
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:
> asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *Kim Delevati
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 06, 2009 9:35 AM
> *To:* asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
> *Subject:* [asterisk-users] Asterisk + Monitor() Poor quality
>
>
>
> Hi. I'm using the Monitor command to record outgoing calls through SIP, but
> the quality is very poor, MUCH worse than the call itself who many times is
> perfect. I can barely understand anything thats said.
>
> Im using Asterisk 1.4.21.2 on a Ubuntu Server 8.10, on a Pentium R 2ghz
> with 1gb DDR2.
>
> That also happens if I use the Record command. I'm using Monitor inside an
> AGI file, could that be the problem? Or do you think its something else?
>
> _______________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona
> Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20091006/cf330dd7/attachment.htm