Doesnt WAV49 have worse quality than WAV? Or am I wrong?<br><br>On more info, I've tested it on calls using alaw, gsm, g729, and in all the recording has poor quality.<br><br>Tzafrir answered me talking about a debian patch for this issue, does anyone know where to find it?<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/10/6 Danny Nicholas <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:danny@debsinc.com">danny@debsinc.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div link="blue" vlink="purple" lang="EN-US">
<div>
<p><font size="2" color="navy" face="Arial"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: navy;">I doubt AGI is the issue. You can verify
this by setting up a context to record a call without AGI. I’d try using
the WAV49 format instead of regular WAV.</span></font></p>
<p><font size="2" color="navy" face="Arial"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: navy;"> </span></font></p>
<div>
<div style="text-align: center;" align="center"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">
<hr size="2" align="center" width="100%">
</span></font></div>
<p><b><font size="2" face="Tahoma"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma; font-weight: bold;">From:</span></font></b><font size="2" face="Tahoma"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma;">
<a href="mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com" target="_blank">asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com" target="_blank">asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com</a>]
<b><span style="font-weight: bold;">On Behalf Of </span></b>Kim Delevati<br>
<b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Tuesday, October 06, 2009
9:35 AM<br>
<b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b>
<a href="mailto:asterisk-users@lists.digium.com" target="_blank">asterisk-users@lists.digium.com</a><br>
<b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> [asterisk-users] Asterisk
+ Monitor() Poor quality</span></font></p>
</div><div class="im">
<p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Hi. I'm using the Monitor command to record outgoing calls through SIP,
but the quality is very poor, MUCH worse than the call itself who many times is
perfect. I can barely understand anything thats said.<br>
<br>
Im using Asterisk 1.4.21.2 on a Ubuntu Server 8.10, on a Pentium R 2ghz with
1gb DDR2.<br>
<br>
That also happens if I use the Record command. I'm using Monitor inside an AGI
file, could that be the problem? Or do you think its something else?</span></font></p>
</div></div>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by <a href="http://www.api-digital.com" target="_blank">http://www.api-digital.com</a> --<br>
<br>
AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona<br>
Register Now: <a href="http://www.astricon.net" target="_blank">http://www.astricon.net</a><br>
<br>
asterisk-users mailing list<br>
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br>
<a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users" target="_blank">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users</a><br></blockquote></div><br>