[asterisk-users] Asterisk + Monitor() Poor quality

[Danny Nicholas]

WAV49 is by definition lesser quality but Louder sound, which might help the
perceived quality.

 

  _____  

From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Kim Delevati
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 10:23 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk + Monitor() Poor quality

 

Doesnt WAV49 have worse quality than WAV? Or am I wrong?

On more info, I've tested it on calls using alaw, gsm, g729, and in all the
recording has poor quality.

Tzafrir answered me talking about a debian patch for this issue, does anyone
know where to find it?

2009/10/6 Danny Nicholas <danny at debsinc.com>

I doubt AGI is the issue.  You can verify this by setting up a context to
record a call without AGI.  I'd try using the WAV49 format instead of
regular WAV.

 

  _____  

From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Kim Delevati
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 9:35 AM
To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk + Monitor() Poor quality

 

Hi. I'm using the Monitor command to record outgoing calls through SIP, but
the quality is very poor, MUCH worse than the call itself who many times is
perfect. I can barely understand anything thats said.

Im using Asterisk 1.4.21.2 on a Ubuntu Server 8.10, on a Pentium R 2ghz with
1gb DDR2.

That also happens if I use the Record command. I'm using Monitor inside an
AGI file, could that be the problem? Or do you think its something else?


_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20091006/507b666a/attachment.htm