[asterisk-users] astmanproxy?

James Green james.green at mjog.com
Thu Jul 23 03:04:45 CDT 2009


Hmm I was given the impression that the .call files were risky due to
locking issues... Is this no longer the case perhaps?
 
I also require knowledge of whether the originate was successful or
otherwise, with BUSY vs CONGESTION, etc.

________________________________

From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Steve
Totaro
Sent: 22 July 2009 17:56
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] astmanproxy?

When faced with this same problem, creating and FTPing .call files to
the outgoing spool directory freed up the AMI for other functions.

Plain, simple, and "Just Worked"  I looked at, but never tried
AstManProxy because I prefer to eliminate levels of complexity and
points of failure rather than add, whenever possible.

Not saying that this is your best solution, just what I found to be much
more reliable than pounding the AMI. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090723/dc5b5575/attachment.htm 
-------------- next part --------------

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.24/2255 - Release Date: 07/22/09 18:00:00


More information about the asterisk-users mailing list