[asterisk-users] Asterisk - Trixbox

[Mike Hammett]

Yeah.  They were running a Clarent switch and that's the one that came down. 
They also had\have a Coppercom switch.

The Clarent was old, though I really didn't have any problems with it.  I 
could never get the Coppercom to work with Asterisk (though I'm an expert at 
neither) and their tech support told my carrier to fly a kite when we were 
having T38 issues.


-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--------------------------------------------------
From: "Steve Totaro" <stotaro at totarotechnologies.com>
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 9:36 AM
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" 
<asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk - Trixbox

> Your carrier is running Trixbox?  That is scary.
>
> Anyways, they are obviously routing calls to the wrong machine.  If
> your side worked properly before and now does not, then they have to
> explain why.
>
> That would be my stance anyways.
>
> Thanks,
> Steve
>
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Mike Hammett <asterisk-users at ics-il.net> 
> wrote:
>> They are running Trixbox 2.6.1.10 and I'm running Asterisk 1.2.12.1.
>>
>>
>> -----
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> From: "Mike Hammett" <asterisk-users at ics-il.net>
>> Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 1:47 PM
>> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
>> <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
>> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk - Trixbox
>>
>>> Should Trixbox be sending calls to the s extension in the first place? 
>>> I
>>> can't set an s extension because there are many independent phone 
>>> numbers
>>> in
>>> that context that worked fine before my provider switched to Trixbox.
>>>
>>> Also, why would the 8159093011 phone number be showing up in the sip
>>> debugging when that number isn't even present on that machine?
>>>
>>>
>>> -----
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------
>>> From: "Adrià Vidal" <adriavidal at gmail.com>
>>> Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 2:44 PM
>>> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
>>> <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk - Trixbox
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Mike Hammett 
>>>> <asterisk-users at ics-il.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> My provider migrated from an old EOL softswitch to Trixbox.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a number (8159093011) on a different server on a different
>>>>> network.
>>>>> It appears as though the incoming calls are trying to authenticate
>>>>> against
>>>>> that number, which isn't present on the box.  Could someone help me
>>>>> decode
>>>>> this debugging output?  I was calling 8159911010.  My server is
>>>>> 208.100.1.33.  Theirs is 208.1.87.235.  I solved the s@ problem on the
>>>>> other
>>>>> server by adding insecure settings, but that didn't seem to solve it 
>>>>> on
>>>>> this
>>>>> one.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://pastebin.com/f5151341f
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----
>>>>> Mike Hammett
>>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think you need something inside [DID-incoming] like for example...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> exten => s,1,NoOP(---------incoming call-------)
>>>> exten => s,n,Playback(wellcome)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> #
>>>> Looking for s in DID-incoming (domain 208.100.1.33)
>>>> #
>>>> Reliably Transmitting (no NAT) to 208.1.87.235:5060:
>>>> #
>>>> SIP/2.0 404 Not Found
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> --
>>>> Adrià Vidal
>>>> adriavidal at gmail.com
>>>> _______________________________________________
>
> _______________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>