[asterisk-users] Asterisk - Trixbox
Paul Hales
pdhales at optusnet.com.au
Mon Feb 2 15:35:32 CST 2009
I don't think scary is a strong enough word....terrifying? horrifying?
abominable?
PaulH
Steve Totaro wrote:
> Your carrier is running Trixbox? That is scary.
>
> Anyways, they are obviously routing calls to the wrong machine. If
> your side worked properly before and now does not, then they have to
> explain why.
>
> That would be my stance anyways.
>
> Thanks,
> Steve
>
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Mike Hammett <asterisk-users at ics-il.net> wrote:
>
>> They are running Trixbox 2.6.1.10 and I'm running Asterisk 1.2.12.1.
>>
>>
>> -----
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> From: "Mike Hammett" <asterisk-users at ics-il.net>
>> Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 1:47 PM
>> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
>> <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
>> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk - Trixbox
>>
>>
>>> Should Trixbox be sending calls to the s extension in the first place? I
>>> can't set an s extension because there are many independent phone numbers
>>> in
>>> that context that worked fine before my provider switched to Trixbox.
>>>
>>> Also, why would the 8159093011 phone number be showing up in the sip
>>> debugging when that number isn't even present on that machine?
>>>
>>>
>>> -----
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------
>>> From: "Adrià Vidal" <adriavidal at gmail.com>
>>> Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 2:44 PM
>>> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
>>> <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk - Trixbox
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Mike Hammett <asterisk-users at ics-il.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> My provider migrated from an old EOL softswitch to Trixbox.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a number (8159093011) on a different server on a different
>>>>> network.
>>>>> It appears as though the incoming calls are trying to authenticate
>>>>> against
>>>>> that number, which isn't present on the box. Could someone help me
>>>>> decode
>>>>> this debugging output? I was calling 8159911010. My server is
>>>>> 208.100.1.33. Theirs is 208.1.87.235. I solved the s@ problem on the
>>>>> other
>>>>> server by adding insecure settings, but that didn't seem to solve it on
>>>>> this
>>>>> one.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://pastebin.com/f5151341f
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----
>>>>> Mike Hammett
>>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think you need something inside [DID-incoming] like for example...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> exten => s,1,NoOP(---------incoming call-------)
>>>> exten => s,n,Playback(wellcome)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> #
>>>> Looking for s in DID-incoming (domain 208.100.1.33)
>>>> #
>>>> Reliably Transmitting (no NAT) to 208.1.87.235:5060:
>>>> #
>>>> SIP/2.0 404 Not Found
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> --
>>>> Adrià Vidal
>>>> adriavidal at gmail.com
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list