[asterisk-users] regexten & regcontext broken for SIP?

[Watkins, Bradley]

Can either or both of you post the relevant sections of your sip.conf
and extensions.conf?
 
- Brad


________________________________

	From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Andrew
Joakimsen
	Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 1:51 PM
	To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
	Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] regexten & regcontext broken for
SIP?
	
	
	I am having the same issues. Did you ever file a bug report?
	
	
	On 10/6/06, Philipp von Klitzing <
klitzing at pool.informatik.rwth-aachen.de
<mailto:klitzing at pool.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> > wrote: 

		Hi ho,
		
		is there anyone out here that is making use of the
regcontext and 
		regexten settings in sip.conf? I've tried this on two
Asterisk boxes
		(1.2.10 and 1.2.12.1) and in both cases I don't see the
Noop priority 1
		being created upon SIP client registration, "show
dialplan xxx" reveals 
		no change.
		
		And yes, I have also read and checked bug 7144; if I go
down that route
		and no SIP client is registered I get a CLI warning that
my standard
		context tries to include an empty context - go figure...

		http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=7144
		
		So, do I need to file a bug report, or is it working OK
for others?
		
		Cheers, Philipp
		
		P.S.: Of course I am aware of this Wiki page: 
	
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk+sip+regcontext
		
		
		_______________________________________________
		--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
		
		asterisk-users mailing list
		To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
	
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users 
		


The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and then destroy it. 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20061102/2749927b/attachment.htm