[Asterisk-Users] Phones were working fine - Now there isnoaudiowhen calling between extensions

[Gabriel Afana]

The reason I say they are not the best is because they have no ability to 
connect to a STUN server and they have no keep-alive mechanism for NAT.

At VON, I was talking to a company called Ranch Networks who said they have 
a device that will solve NAT traversal issues with Asterisk and its phones. 
Here is a link to their product:
http://www.ranchnetworks.com/pdfs/RN40_41_brief.pdf

I am talking to them now to see exactly what this thing does.

- Gabe


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Charles Marcus" <CMarcus at Media-Brokers.com>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" 
<asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 4:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones were working fine - Now there 
isnoaudiowhen calling between extensions


>C F wrote:
>> Polycoms are not the best if you want a phone that works behind NAT.
>
> Do you mean in general? Or only if you are trying to interconnect multiple 
> offices?
>
> Are Polycoms fine for just one office, if the entire office is behind a 
> NAT device, and the phones are only being used for normal calling?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- 
>
> Charles
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users