[Asterisk-Users] voip-info.org unreliable lately?

[Jay Milk]

As I understand it, the wiki software behind voip-info is not able to
keep up with the load.  There may be better (-performing) alternatives
such as MediaWiki, but the question would be that of conversion... And
whether the owner even wants to convert.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bjørn Ove Kristiansen [mailto:bok2 at online.no] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 10:25 AM
> To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
> Subject: SV: [Asterisk-Users] voip-info.org unreliable lately?
> 
> 
> I think he was referring to load measurements on the server, 
> not the amount of * users. A guideline of how high load 
> should be can be taken from the amount of CPUs on the server 
> we're talking about. If the server runs on a single CPU, then 
> ideal load is up to 1, it it's two CPUs, then up to 2 etc.
> 
> Now, these are just guidelines. I am not saying that a server 
> cannot handle higher load, but if it exceeds these 
> guidelines, then it'll slow the server down. Therefore, 
> unless voip-info.org is running on monster servers, a load of 
> 80 is extremely high.
> 
> Regards,
> Bjorn 
> 
> -----Opprinnelig melding-----
> Fra: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
> [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] På vegne av 
> Damon Estep
> Sendt: 22. juni 2005 16:28
> Til: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Emne: RE: [Asterisk-Users] voip-info.org unreliable lately?
> 
>  
> > Damon Estep wrote:
> > > I assume the bandwidth is being donated or something, but surely
> someone
> > > would be willing to donate reliable bandwidth as the knowledge
> hosted on
> > > the site (which is also donated!) is worth way more than the
> bandwidth.
> > 
> > Sure it's the bandwidth? If the wiki is loaded, I see 
> "Server load" on 
> > the bottom of the page, the numbers sometimes go as high as 
> 80-100..?
> > 
> > Not sure if it's a Linux (guess so? :p) but if that represents the 
> > system load.. 80 is a 'bit' high indeed.
> > 
> > Cheers
> > 
> 
> 80-100 might be a lot for the current environment, but given 
> the number of * users it is very small. Point is the server 
> and bandwidth should be able to handle a lot more users if we 
> are all going to rely on it as the (un)official repository 
> for * guides.
> 
> I have seen many posts from users willing to pitch in, but 
> still have no idea where the site is now or what the 
> arrangement is. _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com 
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/aster> isk-users
> To 
> UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users