[Asterisk-Users] Transfer differences between BudgeTone101 and Snom190

[Greg Oliver]

You can try the ${RDNIS} variable.


On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 00:32 +0200, Elwin Andriol wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> This email is intended rather informative than questioning. While 
> developing some script-generated dial plan, we figured out that there 
> are differences between Snom 190's and BudgeTone 101's relating to 
> transfers.
> 
> It appeared that the 190's will have their own 'Caller ID' set as the 
> 'CALLERID' variable in astersisk when transfering a call, while the 
> 101's will have the initial caller's ID set as the 'CALLERID' variable 
> on transfering a call.
> 
> We do some 'line access' determination based on an internal SIP device's 
> caller ID. It worked fine for 190's (both for normal calls and on 
> transfers) but it failed on the 101's on transfers, because the latter 
> doesn't give it's own caller ID (or at least it won't get loader into 
> the asterisk's CALLERID variable). I've found some references that said 
> that the differences between the 190's and 101's might be the result of 
> unclear definitions the the SIP transfer RFC.
> 
> Anyone figured out how I might get a transfering party's caller ID on a 
> BT101? Otherwise I will have to trash the 101's (I hate these garbage 
> phones anyway, but it would be nice for customers if they're able to 
> choose between 101's and more expensive 190's).
> 
> Using asterisk 1.0.7 + bristuff RC8g; version 3.56m on the snom190's and 
> version 1.0.6.3 on the BT101's.
> 
> regards, Elwin Andriol
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users