[Asterisk-Users] Difference between Asterisk and Asterisk@home

[trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com]

On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 07:04 +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 10:18:26PM -0500, Andrew Latham wrote:
> > That question could start a battle.
> > 
> > Asterisk at Home is a bootable Asterisk system. Think of it as the
> > Knoppix of the Linux distro world. It could work but that is for you
> > to decide.
> 
> OT:
> 
> Not a "Knoppix", actually. You can't do anything useful with it without a
> HD install. A while ago I needed badly to test a certain system with
> Asterisk without installing it and was amazed to see the little existing
> support LiveCDs had of Asterisk. I ended up using AsteriskLive 0.1.6,
> even though it was rather old.
> 

If you wanted a knoppix install there is knopsterix, which can save your
config without overwriting your whole drive without prompting you to
save a partition or two.

-- 
Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com     Bret McDanel
UK +44 870 340 4605   Germany +49 801 777 555 3402
US +1 360 207 0479 or +1 516 687 5200
FreeWorldDialup: 635378
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050717/062806aa/attachment.pgp