[Asterisk-Users] G.729? Worth it?

Luke Catranis luke at catranis.net
Wed Jan 19 11:22:56 MST 2005


I do not experience the same issues as below. I personally think g729 is
more then worth the $10 per licensed channel. I have 10 licensed
channels and they are worth every penny. The call quality is far
superior to gsm or g726 and is nearly identical to a g711 call. My
application is probably different then yours, I convert everything to
g711 to my terminators to ensure pristine call quality.



-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Paul Rodan
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 1:17 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] G.729? Worth it?

Funny thing about g729, when I setup my server to ONLY allow g729, and
then
put my Cisco 7960's phone into g729 mode, the first call went through
fine
as g729. If I put that party on hold, and dialed another number, that
too
would be g729. But if I tried to call 1 party, and conference in another
party, I got codec warning messages, the phone(s) were trying to make
the
2nd call as ULaw, and what's worst, it try to transform the original
stream
that was g729 into ULaw as well.

I've gotten some strange behaviour of my Sipura and using g729 with
multiple
streams as well. Certain calls try to revert back to ULaw. 

For the most part, I've given up on g729. 



-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Matt
Schulte
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 12:55 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] G.729? Worth it?

There's a MOS scale for this kind of stuff

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Fielding [mailto:paul.fielding at shaw.ca] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 11:24 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] G.729? Worth it?


> Low bandwidth
> Low CPU utilization
> Best audio quality
>

I think you might want to clarify that Best audio quality is in relation
to 
other highly compressed codecs.  Certainly my (albeit limited)
experience is 
that g711 is much more clear than g729.   Compared against gsm, for
example, 
however, the audio quality is quite good....

regards,

Paul 

_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users





More information about the asterisk-users mailing list