[Asterisk-Users] G.729? Worth it?

[Aaron Johnson]

Paul Rodan wrote:

>Funny thing about g729, when I setup my server to ONLY allow g729, and then
>put my Cisco 7960's phone into g729 mode, the first call went through fine
>as g729. If I put that party on hold, and dialed another number, that too
>would be g729. But if I tried to call 1 party, and conference in another
>party, I got codec warning messages, the phone(s) were trying to make the
>2nd call as ULaw, and what's worst, it try to transform the original stream
>that was g729 into ULaw as well.
>  
>
The Cisco 7940 and 7960 phones do not support conferencing in 
low-bandwidth (g729) mode.

-- 
Aaron Johnson
Star Networks
Main: 602-889-3000 | Office: 602-889-3002 | Cell: 602-741-4660