[Asterisk-Users] 13 sec. delay what is causing it?

Eric Wieling eric at fnords.org
Sat Sep 18 15:44:52 MST 2004


On Sat, 2004-09-18 at 17:21, Lyle Giese wrote:
> Perfectly normal.  On analog lines, the caller id is set between the 1st and
> 2nd rings.  So Asterisk has to wait for the caller id and depending on the
> speed of the computer that hosts Asterisk, 13 seconds is exactly right.  A
> normal ring cycle is 2 secs ring on 4 seconds of silence, so the 2nd ring is
> 12 seconds into the call.
> 
> I just put in a nice Asus motherboard with a 500 mhz front side bus, 2.4 gig
> AMD processor & 512 meg ram for the pbx here and I get the first ring on the
> extensions at the same time as the second ring on the incoming ring.  I was
> testing and trialing on a celeron 1.4ghz machine with 256 meg ram and the
> video borrowed some of the system ram.  The analog extensions were not
> ringing until the third incoming ring on that slow machine.

System speed has VERY little to do with this.  If Asterisk expects to
get Caller*ID and the PSTN line does not have Caller*ID service on the
line. Asterisk has to wait until the beginning of the second ring before
giving up on getting any Caller*ID.  If your PSTN line doesn't have
Caller*ID service then tell Asterisk not to expect Caller*ID then the
delay will be MUCH less.  This is covered over and over and over again
in the mailing list archives.

-- 
          Eric Wieling * BTEL Consulting * 504-899-1387 x2111
"In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows
upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss."




More information about the asterisk-users mailing list