[Asterisk-Users] DUNDi in stable? (New subject)

[Deon Rodden]

Ummm... It used to be a while back there were 2 different CVS servers or
directories or something, 1 for Head and 1 for Stable. But some time ago,
only one version of CVS showed. I assumed they temporarily merged the 2,
every new release was just a new stable release. 

I'm now on the download section of asterisk.org and still see no mention of
head vs stable. The only mention of stable is:

cvs checkout -r v1-0 zaptel libpri asterisk asterisk-addons asterisk-sounds


But my assumption is that will download version 1.0 only? Hasn't there been
any new bug fixes, still considered stable, since the release of 1.0? How do
I go about getting the latest stable, 1.0 with all the bug fixes up until
now, no new features or ways of doing things or syntax changes in the
configuration files?

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Eric Wieling
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 5:19 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi in stable? (New subject)

mattf wrote:

> With other projects maybe, but with Asterisk it's hardly the wild side.
This
> project has consistently had the most stable CVS versions of any project
> I've ever used code from.

This will change.  Heck, it already has.  None of the 3rd party Asterisk 
modules that I know of will work with -HEAD.  chan_h323 was broken for a 
while, Caller*ID was broken for a while.

Asterisk is growing up.  Instead of having only one CVS branch where 
everyone has to be VERY careful about adding new features, we now have 
two CVS branches, 1.0-STABLE and CVS-HEAD.  Where -STABLE is only bug 
fixes and -HEAD is used to try out new features, code, etc.  I don't 
care if the CVS-HEAD version of Asterisk breaks since I use Asterisk on 
production systems and use 1.0-STABLE.  If 1.0-STABLE broke or changed 
behavour I'd be pretty pissed off.