[Asterisk-Users] Re: STUN and Asterisk? (Was: SER is a better NAT solution?)

[Stephen R. Besch]

Matthew Boehm wrote:

> STUN requires 2 NIC interfaces on the machine running the server right? And
> both interfaces need seperate public IP's right? 'And' the phones/ATA's need
> to support STUN right? I don't think the Cisco phones support STUN.
> 
Why 2 NICS. There should be no reason that you can't assign a public and 
a private IP to the same NIC. In fact, I'm doing exactly that on both my 
Windows and my Linux boxes.

Stephen R. Besch