[Asterisk-Users] STUN and Asterisk? (Was: SER is a better NAT solution?)

[Lyle Giese]

You need two public ip addresses. I am running STUN on one nic.  I don't
know about the Cisco phones however.

I have a Gradnstream and a couple of soft phones bouncing off my STUN
server.

Lyle

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Matthew Boehm" <mboehm at cytelcom.com>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
<asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 9:51 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] STUN and Asterisk? (Was: SER is a better NAT
solution?)


> STUN requires 2 NIC interfaces on the machine running the server right?
And
> both interfaces need seperate public IP's right? 'And' the phones/ATA's
need
> to support STUN right? I don't think the Cisco phones support STUN.
>
> -Matthew
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Brian Wilkins" <brian at hcc.net>
> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
> <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 4:25 AM
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SER is a better NAT solution?
> Addendum:LinksysWRT54G
>
>
> > If you had 100,000 phones registering to the Asterisk server, I would
> think
> > you would have at least two or three more Asterisk servers for people to
> > point to their devices to. Who is to say that SER won't crash with
100,000
> > registrations either? You could always use a STUN server on each
Asterisk
> box
> > and that will work perfectly.
> >
> >
> > On Tuesday 23 November 2004 03:13 pm, Matthew Boehm wrote:
> > > Yes, exactly! I think 100,000 phones all regeristing every 60 seconds
> would
> > > put quite a load. And if 50% of them are all behind NAT/FW, asterisk
> > > wouldn't play nice, would it?
> > >
> > > So, is SER a better option for this?
> > >
> > > -Matthew
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Matt Riddell" <matt.riddell at sineapps.com>
> > > To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
> > > <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
> > > Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 5:38 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SER is a better NAT solution? Addendum:
> > > LinksysWRT54G
> > >
> > > > Tracy R Reed wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 10:00:48AM -0500, Paul Rodan spake thusly:
> > > > >>I am quite interested in this as well. I didn't realize
> registrations
> > >
> > > are
> > >
> > > > >>the #1 cause of load on an asterisk server, we haven't gotten to
> that
> > >
> > > kind
> > >
> > > > >>of usage just yet.
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't think they are, are they? How could a few registration
> packets
> > > > > per phone once an hour come anywhere near the load of a single sip
> > >
> > > session?
> > >
> > > > I guess if you have 100,000 customers.  Say 5-10% are making calls
and
> > > > yet all of them register?
> > > >
> > > > Maybe.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Cheers,
> > > >
> > > > Matt Riddell
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > >
> > > > http://www.sineapps.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html)
> > > > http://www.sineapps.com/rssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss)
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > > > Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> > > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> > > >    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > > Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> > >    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
> > -- 
> > Brian Wilkins
> > Software Engineer
> > brian at hcc.net
> >
> > Heritage Communications Corporation
> >   Melbourne, FL     USA     32935
> > 321.308.4000 x33
> > http://www.hcc.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>