[Asterisk-Users] Re: STUN and Asterisk? (Was: SER is a better NATsolution?)

[Paul Rodan]

Stun requires 2 separate public IP addresses? For comparison? Can they be on
the same subnet? I found a stun program but never got around to configuring
it. Is it as simple as it seems? Program it with both IP's, set it and
forget it?

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Stephen R.
Besch
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 11:23 AM
To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Re: STUN and Asterisk? (Was: SER is a better
NATsolution?)

Matthew Boehm wrote:

> STUN requires 2 NIC interfaces on the machine running the server right?
And
> both interfaces need seperate public IP's right? 'And' the phones/ATA's
need
> to support STUN right? I don't think the Cisco phones support STUN.
> 
Why 2 NICS. There should be no reason that you can't assign a public and 
a private IP to the same NIC. In fact, I'm doing exactly that on both my 
Windows and my Linux boxes.

Stephen R. Besch

_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users