[Asterisk-Users] ASTERISK V. SER

[Kevin Brennan]

Getting back to the original questions ASTERISK V SER. From reading on SER
it's designed to purely to be a SIP server (registrar, proxy, redirect) and
is much better than * at that. Since SER is SIP based it will be handling
call control and not voice traffic. As mentioned on wiki SER & * work well
together is a scalable VOIP solution  SER handles registrar (provisioning)
and proxy, * is PSTN gway/voicemail. Don't ask me howto this is preaching
without practice. The VOIP cookbook has a good overview which you can
download from http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~prelle/terena/.
Br /Kev/


----- Original Message -----
From: "Aaron J. Angel" <aaron at angel-family.com>
To: <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 8:16 PM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] ASTERISK V. SER


> Usedcanon wrote:
> > Just out of interest (as I am a freeBSD fan) why more stable on BSD ?
>
> I have no idea, it just seems to run better on *BSD.  I'm still trying to
> investigate that myself.  Perhaps I'm just inept when it comes to Linux,
but
> it has never run decently for me -- I've always had problems with
whichever
> distro I try.  This time it seems to be the network card mostly, but then
I
> get similar response from the console every now and then, so maybe it's
not
> the NIC.  Maybe I should have rephrased that or left it out, as it's
> probably not Asterisk that is more stable, technically speaking.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>