AW: AW: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 200 with two extns defined anyone?
Michael Graves
gravesmj at earthlink.net
Sun Jan 4 09:41:25 MST 2004
Rich,
What form of config is required in * to get >1 extensions available.
Single login/registry or multiple? Do I have to specify lines per
Christiasn's earlier mail?
Thanks,
Michael
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 07:58:21 -0600, Rich Adamson wrote:
>Mike,
>
>The v2.03f code (alpha/beta?) did correct the multi-line problems very
>nicely, however I think the snom folks might have another tweak or two
>to make to this code. If your snom 200 is running in a business
>production environment, you might want to wait a little. If you're using
>it in a test/home/soho environment, it would appear the code is good
>enough to play nicely in the multi-extn environment. Hint: after
>upgrading to v2.03f, on the web interface goto Settings/Base and turn
>off the option for "Challenge Response on Phone".
>
>I've not tested this extensively, but v2.03f appears to be very close
>to what I'd consider a production release for basic sip/asterisk use
>then any release that I've tested in the last several months. (Your
>milage may vary!)
>
>In my limited testing, the code handled two extns well, nice Call Waiting
>indication, call hold, alternating between extn 1 and 2 nicely, etc.
>The only somewhat unusual operation that I noticed was: If the phone
>as two calls going on (extn 1 and extn 2, one of which is on hold),
>hanging up the phone causes the two extns to be bridged together without
>any indication that happened on the phone itself (all LED's are off).
>"That" could get to be embarrasing as it would suggest two inbound
>calls from customers/friends/etc are now tied together without you
>knowing it, and no way to recover from that accident.
>
>Rich
>------------------------
>> Please forgive me if this is a silly question. I've been following this
>> thread in the hope that I could put my * server and snom 200 into
>> full-time service very soon. I need to find out how to have the lines
>> configured so that it does not return a busy reply when only one call
>> instances is engaged.
>>
>> Am I supposed to create multiple extensions on my asterisk dialplan to
>> reflect the 5 call instances? That is, would the snom 200 be extension
>> 2000 or 2000-2004?
>>
>> Also, did the 2.03f firmware resolve the matter?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> On Sat, 3 Jan 2004 16:05:39 +0100, Christian Stredicke wrote:
>>
>> >Hi Olle!
>> >
>> >I put something into trouble ticket (I guess you get this as email).
>> >
>> >BTW 2.03f is available at http://snom.com/download/share.
>> >
>> >Christian
>> >
>> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> >> Von: asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-
>> >> admin at lists.digium.com] Im Auftrag von Olle E. Johansson
>> >> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. Januar 2004 11:57
>> >> An: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
>> >> Betreff: Re: AW: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 200 with two extns defined anyone?
>> >>
>> >> Christian Stredicke wrote:
>> >> > We at snom have problems with Asterisk when we receive calls without the
>> >> > line indication. When we register we place a contact like this:
>> >> >
>> >> > REGISTER sip:asterisk SIP/2.0
>> >> > Contact: <sip:123 at 192.168.0.99;line=h35h345>
>> >> >
>> >> > When we receive the 200 Ok, we search for the "h35h345". If we don’t
>> >> find
>> >> > it, we try to guess which line is affected. This is relatively easy on a
>> >> > REGISTER response, but on an incoming INVITE we have serious problems. I
>> >> > think some of the challenging and line-assignment problems are related
>> >> to
>> >> > this problem.
>> >> >
>> >> > Strictly speaking, we register the contact
>> >> > "sip:123 at 192.168.0.99;line=h35h345", NOT "sip:123 at 192.168.0.99"!
>> >> Parameters
>> >> > are an essential part of a URI which must not be discarded.
>> >> Ok, Christian, let's fix this.
>> >>
>> >> First, I'm curious, is the "line=" parameter specified somewhere? (Always
>> >> looking
>> >> for documentation :-)
>> >>
>> >> Secondly, in many places in the sip channel, everything after the ";" is
>> >> discarded.
>> >> I would really appreciate if Snom could help us fixing this, so Snom
>> >> phones work correctly
>> >> and fully with Asterisk. (Have a new Snom 200 on my desk :-)
>> >>
>> >> I'm not an experienced C programmer, so I can't fix this myself. However,
>> >> there are
>> >> experienced C programmers in the community that will fix this, but they
>> >> need proper
>> >> and detailed input on what to fix.
>> >>
>> >> I've opened a bug
>> >> http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000732
>> >>
>> >> Let's continue adding information there.
>> >>
>> >> BTW, there's some other Snom problems where we need input from SNOM.
>> >> Search on "Snom"
>> >> in the bug tracker. Thank you for participating in the Asterisk community!
>> >>
>> >> /O
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Asterisk-Users mailing list
>> >> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>> >> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>> >
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >Asterisk-Users mailing list
>> >Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>> >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>
>> --
>> Michael Graves mgraves at pixelpower.com
>> Sr. Product Specialist www.pixelpower.com
>> Pixel Power Inc. gravesmj at earthlink.net
>>
>> FWD 54245
>>
>> "I am easily satisfied with the very best" - Winston Churchill
>>
>> "The questions arisen, is this a prison? Some say it is, but I say it
>> isn't."
>> - Ian Hunter
>>
>> ** Tag(s) inserted by Bandit Tagger98 - http://www.gbar.dtu.dk/~c918704
>>
>>
>>
>> ===================END FORWARDED MESSAGE===================
>>
>> --
>> Michael Graves mgraves at pixelpower.com
>> Sr. Product Specialist www.pixelpower.com
>> Pixel Power Inc. gravesmj at earthlink.net
>> FWD 54245
>>
>> "I know nothing, but I keep listening." - INXS
>>
>> ** Tag(s) inserted by Bandit Tagger98 - http://www.gbar.dtu.dk/~c918704
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Asterisk-Users mailing list
>> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>---------------End of Original Message-----------------
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
--
Michael Graves mgraves at pixelpower.com
Sr. Product Specialist www.pixelpower.com
Pixel Power Inc. gravesmj at earthlink.net
FWD 54245
"The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a
little longer" - Henry Kissinger
** Tag(s) inserted by Bandit Tagger98 - http://www.gbar.dtu.dk/~c918704
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list