AW: AW: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 200 with two extns defined anyone?
Rich Adamson
radamson at routers.com
Sun Jan 4 06:58:21 MST 2004
Mike,
The v2.03f code (alpha/beta?) did correct the multi-line problems very
nicely, however I think the snom folks might have another tweak or two
to make to this code. If your snom 200 is running in a business
production environment, you might want to wait a little. If you're using
it in a test/home/soho environment, it would appear the code is good
enough to play nicely in the multi-extn environment. Hint: after
upgrading to v2.03f, on the web interface goto Settings/Base and turn
off the option for "Challenge Response on Phone".
I've not tested this extensively, but v2.03f appears to be very close
to what I'd consider a production release for basic sip/asterisk use
then any release that I've tested in the last several months. (Your
milage may vary!)
In my limited testing, the code handled two extns well, nice Call Waiting
indication, call hold, alternating between extn 1 and 2 nicely, etc.
The only somewhat unusual operation that I noticed was: If the phone
as two calls going on (extn 1 and extn 2, one of which is on hold),
hanging up the phone causes the two extns to be bridged together without
any indication that happened on the phone itself (all LED's are off).
"That" could get to be embarrasing as it would suggest two inbound
calls from customers/friends/etc are now tied together without you
knowing it, and no way to recover from that accident.
Rich
------------------------
> Please forgive me if this is a silly question. I've been following this
> thread in the hope that I could put my * server and snom 200 into
> full-time service very soon. I need to find out how to have the lines
> configured so that it does not return a busy reply when only one call
> instances is engaged.
>
> Am I supposed to create multiple extensions on my asterisk dialplan to
> reflect the 5 call instances? That is, would the snom 200 be extension
> 2000 or 2000-2004?
>
> Also, did the 2.03f firmware resolve the matter?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Michael
>
> On Sat, 3 Jan 2004 16:05:39 +0100, Christian Stredicke wrote:
>
> >Hi Olle!
> >
> >I put something into trouble ticket (I guess you get this as email).
> >
> >BTW 2.03f is available at http://snom.com/download/share.
> >
> >Christian
> >
> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >> Von: asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-
> >> admin at lists.digium.com] Im Auftrag von Olle E. Johansson
> >> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. Januar 2004 11:57
> >> An: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
> >> Betreff: Re: AW: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 200 with two extns defined anyone?
> >>
> >> Christian Stredicke wrote:
> >> > We at snom have problems with Asterisk when we receive calls without the
> >> > line indication. When we register we place a contact like this:
> >> >
> >> > REGISTER sip:asterisk SIP/2.0
> >> > Contact: <sip:123 at 192.168.0.99;line=h35h345>
> >> >
> >> > When we receive the 200 Ok, we search for the "h35h345". If we don’t
> >> find
> >> > it, we try to guess which line is affected. This is relatively easy on a
> >> > REGISTER response, but on an incoming INVITE we have serious problems. I
> >> > think some of the challenging and line-assignment problems are related
> >> to
> >> > this problem.
> >> >
> >> > Strictly speaking, we register the contact
> >> > "sip:123 at 192.168.0.99;line=h35h345", NOT "sip:123 at 192.168.0.99"!
> >> Parameters
> >> > are an essential part of a URI which must not be discarded.
> >> Ok, Christian, let's fix this.
> >>
> >> First, I'm curious, is the "line=" parameter specified somewhere? (Always
> >> looking
> >> for documentation :-)
> >>
> >> Secondly, in many places in the sip channel, everything after the ";" is
> >> discarded.
> >> I would really appreciate if Snom could help us fixing this, so Snom
> >> phones work correctly
> >> and fully with Asterisk. (Have a new Snom 200 on my desk :-)
> >>
> >> I'm not an experienced C programmer, so I can't fix this myself. However,
> >> there are
> >> experienced C programmers in the community that will fix this, but they
> >> need proper
> >> and detailed input on what to fix.
> >>
> >> I've opened a bug
> >> http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000732
> >>
> >> Let's continue adding information there.
> >>
> >> BTW, there's some other Snom problems where we need input from SNOM.
> >> Search on "Snom"
> >> in the bug tracker. Thank you for participating in the Asterisk community!
> >>
> >> /O
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> >> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> >> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Asterisk-Users mailing list
> >Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
> --
> Michael Graves mgraves at pixelpower.com
> Sr. Product Specialist www.pixelpower.com
> Pixel Power Inc. gravesmj at earthlink.net
>
> FWD 54245
>
> "I am easily satisfied with the very best" - Winston Churchill
>
> "The questions arisen, is this a prison? Some say it is, but I say it
> isn't."
> - Ian Hunter
>
> ** Tag(s) inserted by Bandit Tagger98 - http://www.gbar.dtu.dk/~c918704
>
>
>
> ===================END FORWARDED MESSAGE===================
>
> --
> Michael Graves mgraves at pixelpower.com
> Sr. Product Specialist www.pixelpower.com
> Pixel Power Inc. gravesmj at earthlink.net
> FWD 54245
>
> "I know nothing, but I keep listening." - INXS
>
> ** Tag(s) inserted by Bandit Tagger98 - http://www.gbar.dtu.dk/~c918704
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
---------------End of Original Message-----------------
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list