[Asterisk-Users] Re: chan_h323 inclusion in Asterisk (was Re: [Asterisk-Users] Linux distro fixation?)

[Jon Pounder]

I don't follow - if the module is in cvs, what is the harm if it builds 
from the main makefile ?
So it takes a few extra seconds to build - so what ?
As long as it is not loaded it is doing no harm just sitting there.

Maybe then a separate make target like "make experimental" to cover this 
"unofficial" stuff.
do it all with the same makefile, and then when stuff is more finalized it 
can move to the plain "make" default target.



>Only if they also where by default turned of in the makefiles also. As
>admitted by the developers, it isn't easy to get set up and happy. I'd
>rather not see the list bombarded by people expecting asterisk to just
>build and get hit with h323 when they may not need it. Outside of that,
>I see no reason why one or both couldn't or shouldn't finally get merged
>into the official CVS tree.
>--
>Steven Critchfield  <critch at basesys.com>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users