[hydra-dev] Proposed Supported Platforms

[Olle E. Johansson]

7 jun 2010 kl. 21.51 skrev Jakub Klausa:

> 
> On 2010-06-07, at 21:44, Marc Blanchet wrote:
> 
>> one of the key point to me is the support of hardware by Hydra. My 
>> asterisk life is much more VoIP and much much less PRI these days. So 
>> without any hardware, then freebsd shall be well supported. But if 
>> people see running hydra with PRI hardware, then freebsd primary support 
>> is less important, since I guess you would not support freebsd hardware 
>> drivers.
> 
> I beg to differ. There's the dahdi for FreeBSD, and it should stay that
> way with hydra (if hydra would do any TDM related task at all).
> 
> The best effort support for FreeBSD with hydra is still better then not
> having support at all, and i think just from the marketing point of view
> even though we're told hydra isn't asterisk 2, people will compare those
> things, and a lost supported platform may be a disadvantage for some.
> 
> So in essence - if we can get FreeBSD supported, with reasonable effort, 
> we probably should.

Why would hydra use Dahdi at all?

I still don't see a definition for Hydra anywhere. What is it, really?

/O