[hydra-dev] Proposed Supported Platforms

[Marc Blanchet]

one of the key point to me is the support of hardware by Hydra. My 
asterisk life is much more VoIP and much much less PRI these days. So 
without any hardware, then freebsd shall be well supported. But if 
people see running hydra with PRI hardware, then freebsd primary support 
is less important, since I guess you would not support freebsd hardware 
drivers.

Marc.

Le 10-06-07 15:24, Joshua Colp a écrit :
> ----- Original Message -----
>> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Joshua Colp<jcolp at digium.com>  wrote:
>
>>>
>>> (*) FreeBSD is not a currently supported platform by ZeroC. This
>>> doesn't mean it will not build
>>> or work though. I spent some time actually making this happen and it
>>> was fairly straightforward,
>>> but did require some code changes that we would have to maintain.
>>> This could become a best effort
>>> supported platform with some initial time required to make our copy
>>> of ICE support it.
>>>
>> Would ZeroC integrate the changes necessary to support FreeBSD?
>
> I don't see why they wouldn't, but it would continue to exist as an
> unsupported platform from them regardless.
>
>>> What does everyone think? Are these the ones that should be
>>> targeted? Are any others missing? Do
>>> you disagree with any on the list?
>>
>> I don't necessarily disagree with the list, but it might be best to
>> have the "fully supported" list mirror ZeroC's, just from a simplicity
>> point of view.
>
> Agreed. FreeBSD can certainly exist under best effort like I said.
>


-- 
=========
IPv6 book: Migrating to IPv6, Wiley. http://www.ipv6book.ca
Stun/Turn server for VoIP NAT-FW traversal: http://numb.viagenie.ca
DTN news service: http://reeves.viagenie.ca
NAT64-DNS64 Opensource: http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca