[hydra-dev] * Fault Tolerance vs High availability
Ed Guy
edguy at eguy.org
Thu Jun 3 09:09:45 CDT 2010
Hydrates,
During the meeting a couple months ago,
there was considerable discussion about fault-tolerance.
In my book, Fault tolerance implies that if there is a system failure
on a component that involves an active call, the call is migrated,
without significant
interruption, to another component.
is this really a requirement??? Most carrier grade systems merely
require high availability. i.e., if a
component fails, a call may drop, but the next call must go through. (
"fives-nines" or better of the time )
Fault tolerant architectures are very expensive and inefficient, but,
sometimes you cant afford any failure.
/ed
More information about the asterisk-scf-dev
mailing list