[asterisk-ha-clustering] Asterisk with LVS

[Edgar Guadamuz]

I had considered LVS as a load balance system for N asterisk cluster,
but it seems to be better use OpenSER, as it is stateless and faster.




On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Chris Bagnall <lists at minotaur.cc> wrote:
> Greetings list,
>
> Has anyone tried running asterisk in an LVS cluster setup where connections are passed to any one of n machines in the cluster?
>
> I've run asterisk with heartbeat/drbd in a failover scenario, but not tried it in an LVS setup before.
>
> Any caveats to be aware of? If anyone's got any config files I could use as a starting point I'd be most grateful...
>
> Regards,
>
> Chris
> --
> C.M. Bagnall, Director, Minotaur I.T. Limited
> For full contact details visit http://www.minotaur.it
> This email is made from 100% recycled electrons
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
>
> asterisk-ha-clustering mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-ha-clustering
>