[asterisk-dev] Module Deprecation, Default Not Building, and Removal

[Jared Smith]

On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 11:50 AM Dan Jenkins <dan at nimblea.pe> wrote:

> sorry, I thought I was agreeing with you :) we need to engage package
> maintainers to potentially help ease the shift - if packages are a
> thing.... but as far as I'm concerned most package managers have out of
> date versions of Asterisk, or don't have things you want so you end up
> building from source anyway
>

I actively package Asterisk for Fedora and EPEL (CentOS/RHEL), and I work
hard to package the latest versions as they are released.  I'm always open
to additional input on how to make my packages more relevant for consumers
-- either by packaging additional modules, or by having better
sub-packages.  For example, my packages already have chan_sip and pjsip
split off as separate subpackages.

-Jared
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20201002/29f032ea/attachment.html>