[asterisk-dev] Module Deprecation, Default Not Building, and Removal

Dan Jenkins dan at nimblea.pe
Fri Oct 2 14:40:38 CDT 2020


I was hoping you'd pipe in again Jared! Thank you!

On Fri, 2 Oct 2020, 20:20 Jared Smith, <jaredsmith at jaredsmith.net> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 11:50 AM Dan Jenkins <dan at nimblea.pe> wrote:
>
>> sorry, I thought I was agreeing with you :) we need to engage package
>> maintainers to potentially help ease the shift - if packages are a
>> thing.... but as far as I'm concerned most package managers have out of
>> date versions of Asterisk, or don't have things you want so you end up
>> building from source anyway
>>
>
> I actively package Asterisk for Fedora and EPEL (CentOS/RHEL), and I work
> hard to package the latest versions as they are released.  I'm always open
> to additional input on how to make my packages more relevant for consumers
> -- either by packaging additional modules, or by having better
> sub-packages.  For example, my packages already have chan_sip and pjsip
> split off as separate subpackages.
>
> -Jared
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-dev mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20201002/7d507e05/attachment.html>


More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list