[asterisk-dev] [BOUNTY] Confbridge feature

[Jaco Kroon]

Hi,

Please see below.


Kind Regards,
Jaco Kroon
C.E.O.

*T:* +27 (0)12 021 0000 | *F:* +27 86 648 8561 | *E:* jaco at iewc.co.za
*W:* iewc.co.za <https://www.iewc.co.za/> | *A:* Unit 201, Building 2B,
Sunwood Park, Queen's Crescent Lynnwood, Pretoria


  	

Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/Interexcel/> Twitter
<https://twitter.com/Interexcel/> Google+
<https://plus.google.com/+InterexcelCoZaPTA/posts> LinkedIn
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/interexcel-world-connection/>

IEWC <https://www.iewc.co.za/> ULS Group <http://www.uls.co.za/>

On 2020/03/11 09:44, John T. Bittner wrote:
>
> Hi Jaco,
>
>  
>
> Channel: PJSIP/101&PJSIP/102
>
>  
>
> In AMI that does not work, you get an error.   (unless I am doing
> something wrong ?)
>

Interesting.

> I am running the latest version 16.
>
>  
>
> If you do Channel:  Local/101
>
> This works if 101 points to a ring group… but no video passes through.
>

What happens if you Answer() before Dial(...)?

In general I recommend against doing that however it seems to
periodically fix some issues, and I've seen people simply recommending
doing this as a rule ...


>  
>
> For most good video door intercoms we don’t have to put them into a
> conference bridge.
>

This is good to know.


> A while back I found an issue with the dial app not sending video when
> sending to more than one phone.
>
> Florian Floimair helped me with a patch to fix it and now the dial app
> works great for the most part.
>

Good.


> With video doorbells that support early video, like the new 2N’s,
> Fanvil and  Grandstream everything works.
>

Good.


> Even with some units like Aiphone and CAME that do not support early
> video work by answering the call before dialing.
>
>
> My issue is with doorbird units and some older 2N’s, they do not
> support early video and when answering before dialing, early video is
> not passed.
>

I suspect you may mean here the Answer() before Dial() I mentioned above?


> We are still trying to figure out why, our work around was to use the
> conference bridge to fix this.
>

Ok, so you could still put into a conf bridge, and then use originate
via Local/ to get another party into the bridge perhaps?

Kind Regards,
Jaco

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20200311/613ad2a7/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ico-facebook.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1302 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20200311/613ad2a7/attachment-0005.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ico-twitter.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1423 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20200311/613ad2a7/attachment-0006.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ico-linkedin.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1444 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20200311/613ad2a7/attachment-0007.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ie.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3906 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20200311/613ad2a7/attachment-0008.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ulsgroup.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 10458 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20200311/613ad2a7/attachment-0009.jpg>