[asterisk-dev] Asterisk - binary naming convention is not approperiate

[Jason Parker]

On 08/04/2012 01:56 PM, Bruce B wrote:
> The naming convention for *"asterisknow"* version are not good. There 
> should be a universal current version named 
> *"asterisknow-current_centos6.noarch.rpm"*. The reason why I am saying 
> this is because you can't keep up with the documentation on Asterisk 
> Wiki. It still mentions to use *asterisknow-version-1.7.1-3* while you 
> can see below that *asterisknow-version-2.0.0-4 *was release long ago 
> (wiki ref: 
> https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Asterisk+Packages#AsteriskPackages-YUM%28CentOS5%2FRedHatEnterpriseLinux5%29 ) 
>
>
> Please fix this to be one universal package of *asterisknow-current*. 
> So, the wiki doesn't need updates and those who download can have a 
> fixed universal link from a properly organized package.
>
yum renders the initially installed version irrelevant.  The latest 
version of the package will be installed when you update.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20120804/6b9d326f/attachment.htm>