<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 08/04/2012 01:56 PM, Bruce B wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAJyE_uXvWpTcvYrjF726GFS67qDeJV9vtfc6CRn-H9ws26MsjQ@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">The naming convention for <b>"asterisknow"</b>
version are not good. There should be a universal current version
named <b>"asterisknow-current_centos6.noarch.rpm"</b>. The reason
why I am saying this is because you can't keep up with the
documentation on Asterisk Wiki. It still mentions to use <b>asterisknow-version-1.7.1-3</b>
while you can see below that <b
style="background-color:rgb(255,255,255)"><font color="#ff0000">asterisknow-version-2.0.0-4
</font></b>was release long ago (wiki ref:
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Asterisk+Packages#AsteriskPackages-YUM%28CentOS5%2FRedHatEnterpriseLinux5%29">https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Asterisk+Packages#AsteriskPackages-YUM%28CentOS5%2FRedHatEnterpriseLinux5%29</a> )
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>Please fix this to be one universal package of <b>asterisknow-current</b>.
So, the wiki doesn't need updates and those who download can
have a fixed universal link from a properly organized package.</div>
<br>
</blockquote>
yum renders the initially installed version irrelevant. The latest
version of the package will be installed when you update.<br>
</body>
</html>