[asterisk-dev] Asterisk - binary naming convention is not approperiate

[Bruce B]

The method I proposed is still superior to the logic of yum update. It's
have an ongoing non-changing "software_name-current" version along with all
other separate version names....


On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Jason Parker <jparker at digium.com> wrote:

>  On 08/04/2012 01:56 PM, Bruce B wrote:
>
> The naming convention for *"asterisknow"* version are not good. There
> should be a universal current version named *
> "asterisknow-current_centos6.noarch.rpm"*. The reason why I am saying
> this is because you can't keep up with the documentation on Asterisk Wiki.
> It still mentions to use *asterisknow-version-1.7.1-3* while you can see
> below that *asterisknow-version-2.0.0-4 *was release long ago (wiki ref:
> https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Asterisk+Packages#AsteriskPackages-YUM%28CentOS5%2FRedHatEnterpriseLinux5%29 )
>
>
>  Please fix this to be one universal package of *asterisknow-current*.
> So, the wiki doesn't need updates and those who download can have a fixed
> universal link from a properly organized package.
>
>  yum renders the initially installed version irrelevant.  The latest
> version of the package will be installed when you update.
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-dev mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20120810/75920a0d/attachment.htm>