[asterisk-dev] 16khz/8khz Translation path

[Russell Bryant]

On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 09:20 -0500, David Vossel wrote:
> I have noticed this as well and this needs to be investigated.  It is possible that the second of audio we use to calculate the the least cost translation path is not accurate enough.   If it turns out that G722 is actually somehow more cost efficient than using the libresample library then we need to come up with a way to force lossless codec translations when they are available.

I think that would be a good thing to put in there regardless.  It
shouldn't be too hard since you already put in some good hooks for
making the cost calculation take things other than time into account.

-- 
Russell Bryant
Digium, Inc.  |  Engineering Manager, Open Source Software
445 Jan Davis Drive NW   -    Huntsville, AL 35806  -  USA
jabber: rbryant at digium.com    -=-    skype: russell-bryant
www.digium.com -=- www.asterisk.org -=- blogs.asterisk.org