[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] Merge Called party identification changes into trunk.

[Mark Michelson]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.digium.com/r/201/
-----------------------------------------------------------

Review request for Asterisk Developers.


Summary
-------

This diff encompasses the changes between the issue8824 branch and Asterisk trunk. These changes include all the changes necessary to allow for the transmission and reception of remote called party identification (COLP/CONP).


This addresses bug 8824.
    http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=8824


Diffs
-----

  /trunk/CHANGES 182643 
  /trunk/apps/app_dial.c 182643 
  /trunk/apps/app_directed_pickup.c 182643 
  /trunk/apps/app_queue.c 182643 
  /trunk/channels/chan_agent.c 182643 
  /trunk/channels/chan_dahdi.c 182643 
  /trunk/channels/chan_h323.c 182643 
  /trunk/channels/chan_iax2.c 182643 
  /trunk/channels/chan_local.c 182643 
  /trunk/channels/chan_mgcp.c 182643 
  /trunk/channels/chan_misdn.c 182643 
  /trunk/channels/chan_phone.c 182643 
  /trunk/channels/chan_sip.c 182643 
  /trunk/channels/chan_skinny.c 182643 
  /trunk/channels/chan_unistim.c 182643 
  /trunk/channels/misdn/chan_misdn_config.h 182643 
  /trunk/channels/misdn/isdn_lib.h 182643 
  /trunk/channels/misdn/isdn_lib.c 182643 
  /trunk/channels/misdn/isdn_lib_intern.h 182643 
  /trunk/channels/misdn/isdn_msg_parser.c 182643 
  /trunk/channels/misdn_config.c 182643 
  /trunk/configs/misdn.conf.sample 182643 
  /trunk/configs/sip.conf.sample 182643 
  /trunk/include/asterisk/callerid.h 182643 
  /trunk/include/asterisk/channel.h 182643 
  /trunk/include/asterisk/frame.h 182643 
  /trunk/main/callerid.c 182643 
  /trunk/main/channel.c 182643 
  /trunk/main/dial.c 182643 
  /trunk/main/features.c 182643 
  /trunk/main/rtp.c 182643 

Diff: http://reviewboard.digium.com/r/201/diff


Testing
-------

Digium's Product Quality department has extensively tested a remarkably similar version of these enhancements. In addition, we know of a customer who has been using this branch for some months now in a production environment. I would also be willing to bet that some of those who have been monitoring issue 8824 have also done some testing as well.


Thanks,

Mark