[asterisk-dev] Moving H.323 forward by linking to a new library

Ming-Ching Tiew mctiew at yahoo.com
Thu Mar 12 20:05:05 CDT 2009



How about ooh323c ? Completely self contained, C-based, does not require any other external libraries. Compared to others which requires whole bunch of other things and C++ compilers.

--- On Thu, 3/12/09, Jeff Peeler <jpeeler at digium.com> wrote:

> From: Jeff Peeler <jpeeler at digium.com>
> Subject: [asterisk-dev] Moving H.323 forward by linking to a new library
> To: "Asterisk Developers Mailing List" <asterisk-dev at lists.digium.com>
> Date: Thursday, March 12, 2009, 11:48 PM
> This thread has been prompted by bug 11261, which is a patch
> to allow use of
> the H.323 Plus library instead of OpenH323. H323Plus seems
> to be maintained,
> while OpenH323 is completely dead. I've looked at the
> patch and think that
> both can probably be supported currently without too much
> effort. I also
> quickly tested with trunk to make sure calls using H323Plus
> worked alright.
> Before starting down that road though we should consider if
> there are any
> other options. Are there any other libraries that should be
> considered?
> Using OPAL would be nice, but would require an amount of
> effort that is
> probably currently not feasible. Assuming there are no
> other options I
> wonder if it would be best to eventually deprecate usage
> with OpenH323.
> 
> --
> Jeff Peeler
> Digium, Inc. | Software Developer
> 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
> Check us out at www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by
> http://www.api-digital.com--
> 
> asterisk-dev mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev


      



More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list