[asterisk-dev] [svn-commits] lmadsen: trunk r149040 - /trunk/doc/manager_1_1.txt

Kevin P. Fleming kpfleming at digium.com
Wed Oct 15 03:51:53 CDT 2008

Johansson Olle E wrote:

> We could propably use the event name "Registry" for this too. We're  
> using "Status" instead of "State" in many cases, like "PeerStatus". I  
> don't like using generic names like "State", "RegisterState" makes  
> more sense and is more unique.
> We need to use the same headers as other events and this doesn't even  
> attempt to do that.

These two paragraphs are somewhat conflicting; either we use the same
headers as other events or we don't. There is no need for the 'State' to
be 'RegisterState' when it is already embedded inside a 'Registry'
event; there is no expectation that any event headers will be
understandable without the entire context of the event they are part of.
I would actually much prefer that we use the exact same header name for
the same type of information, regardless of which event type it is
embedded into.

Kevin P. Fleming
Director of Software Technologies
Digium, Inc. - "The Genuine Asterisk Experience" (TM)

More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list