[asterisk-dev] [non]optimized builds

[Tzafrir Cohen]

On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 12:53:07AM -0600, Tilghman Lesher wrote:

> I wouldn't mind seeing some statistics that back that claim up and add some
> clarity.  For example, are only released versions optimized by default?  What
> about development or beta versions?  

Practically all of the code released is built with -O2 / -O3 .

> Should those versions include debugging
> symbols and be unoptimized by default?

Debugging symbols are a different matter, and unrelated to optimiations.
In fact, most binary packages of Asterisk keep the debugging symbols in
a separate package so you won't have to install them if you don't need
them. You can install them in retrospect after a crash to examine a core
file.

-- 
               Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755              jabber:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com
+972-50-7952406           mailto:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:guest at local.xorcom.com/tzafrir