[asterisk-dev] builtin values and CLI changes in res_features

[Tzafrir Cohen]

On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 04:05:21PM -0300, Caio Begotti wrote:
> Hi, I'm looking to know what do you guys think about the changes
> posted at: http://bugs.digium.com/10524
> 
> I've talked to Junk-Y and he told me the CLI changes are nice but
> he's not so sure about removing default builtins. My argument is in
> the link above, but it's that having default builtins for features
> like transfer and parking is wrong when you must set a blank value to
> set it off.
> 
> I just don't know wheter it's "wrong and silly" or "wrong but
> acceptable for most people". That's why I'm asking for input :-)
> 
> There are samples attached in 10524 showing what changes as well. Do
> you think this can be commited in trunk or removing default builtins
> such like that is risky?

A counter-example is indications.conf, where the user really must add
the huge sample config file (but most people should edit it. And at one
small specific place in the beginning) because the default indication
values are not provided in the system.

-- 
               Tzafrir Cohen       
icq#16849755                    jabber:tzafrir at jabber.org
+972-50-7952406           mailto:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com       
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:guest at local.xorcom.com/tzafrir