[asterisk-dev] Asterisk 1.6 Release Management Proposal

[Russell Bryant]

Simon Perreault wrote:
> Here's one suggestion for sections 3.2.3 and 3.2.5. Instead of saying
> 
> 1. Commit to branch X
> 2. Commit to branch Y
> 3. Commit to trunk
> 
> you could probably be clearer with:
> 
> 1. Commit to trunk.
> 2. Merge into branch X.
> 3. Merge into branch Y.
> 
> So now it's in chronological order and has emphasis on the merging (not 
> multiple commits). Maybe another good verb could be "backport".
> 
> Similar comments for sections 3.2.2 and 3.2.4 where some "commit"s could be 
> changed to "merge"s.

Thank you for the feedback.  This is a good suggestion.  I will update the
documentation with the proposed changes.

-- 
Russell Bryant
Senior Software Engineer
Open Source Team Lead
Digium, Inc.