[asterisk-dev] Manager changing to version 1.1

[Sean Bright]

I'm good with using the major version, assuming that nothing about the AMI
protocol is different within a single major version.  Can that really be
guaranteed?  If not, a protocol version is probably a better way to go, so
that connecting applications can adjust their behavior if need be.

On 5/4/07, Russell Bryant <russell at digium.com> wrote:
>
>
> ----- "Olle E Johansson" <olle at voop.com> wrote:
> > I got no protests, so my conclusion is that you all are OK with
> > changing the manager version to 1.1
> > and implementing these changes to existing commands in svn trunk
> > only. Current 1.2 and 1.4 releases
> > will not change.
>
> Thanks a lot for the cleanups.  I'm sure it will be much appreciated by
> the users of the manager interface.
>
> Regarding the version reported when you first connect, I think that we
> should just switch the "1.0" to report ASTERISK_VERSION, or maybe just "
> 1.6" in trunk, and whatever the major version is in the future.  However,
> I'm not going to argue too hard either way, since I'd rather hear the
> opinions from the people that write manager applications.
>
> --
> Russell Bryant
> Software Engineer
> Digium, Inc.
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-dev mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20070504/b008083b/attachment.htm