[asterisk-dev] Increasing AST_PBX_MAX_STACK
Wolfgang Alper
wolfgang.alper at altrust.de
Mon Jul 2 08:27:47 CDT 2007
Hello Alex,
thank you for filing the bug report and prvoiding a conf file to reproduce the issue.
Best regards
Wolfgang
___
Wolfgang Alper
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: asterisk-dev-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-dev-bounces at lists.digium.com] Im Auftrag von Alex B.
Gesendet: Montag, 2. Juli 2007 13:56
An: Asterisk Developers Mailing List
Betreff: Re: [asterisk-dev] Increasing AST_PBX_MAX_STACK
Hello Wolfgang,
actually I've already opened a bug report, see
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=10096
I've attached some plain Asterisk conf files to reproduce the issue because it doesn't really depend on VoiceOne - this is a matter of fact.
Regards,
Alex
2007/7/2, Wolfgang Alper <wolfgang.alper at altrust.de>:
> Hello Alex,
>
> thank you for you confirmation about the nested includes of contextes.
> So it really seems to be a bug in asterisk 1.2 (have not tried this in
> 1.4) Maybe some of the devs can comment on this, before putting it in the bugtracker.
>
> Regards
>
> Wolfgang
>
> ___
> Wolfgang Alper
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: asterisk-dev-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-dev-bounces at lists.digium.com] Im Auftrag von Alex B.
> Gesendet: Montag, 2. Juli 2007 10:08
> An: Asterisk Developers Mailing List
> Betreff: Re: [asterisk-dev] Increasing AST_PBX_MAX_STACK
>
> Hello Wolfgang!
>
> As I wrote, VoiceOne does *NOT* need more than 5 nested includes, so I think that we run into an Asterisk bug. Maybe it was never reproduced so far because it's not very common to have more than 100 contexts included.
>
> Regards,
> Alex
>
>
> 2007/6/29, Wolfgang Alper <wolfgang.alper at altrust.de>:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I recently joined this list so i could not answer directly to the
> > following thread:
> > Topic: [asterisk-dev] Increasing AST_PBX_MAX_STACK
> > http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/2007-June/028182.html
> >
> > We also use Voiceone as a frontend for configuration and
> > administration of asterisk and usally do not exceed a level of 5 for
> > _nesting_ contextes. So the default of 128 for AST_PBX_MAX_STACK should be safe.
> > However, to get it working with > 128 extension, we need to increase
> > AST_PBX_MAX_STACK.
> >
> > With respect to the thread above i wonder wether AST_PBX_MAX_STACK
> > really works as it is supposed to in Asterisk 1.2, because the
> > default value is set to 128 and should support nested contextes
> > within a deep of 128.
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > Wolfgang Alper
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
> >
> > asterisk-dev mailing list
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
>
> asterisk-dev mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
>
> asterisk-dev mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list