[asterisk-dev] Unified Asterisk Interface

[David Roden]

On Monday 10 December 2007 20:17:58 Jim Capp wrote:

> This makes sense, but it is a little scary.  I like the separation of
> AGI and AMI from Asterisk.

And that separation makes sense. What does not make sense (IMHO) is that there 
are two APIs that each allow you to access a certain subset of Asterisk's 
features only and no API that can be used to utilize every feature Asterisk 
has to offer. (Just to make sure: The kind of API I'm talking about allows 
access to Asterisk's features without access to the source code.)


> It allows us to build things without encumbering the server itself.

Right. Currently I have to add three different AGI calls to an Asterisk 
dialplan for my application to work. This is something I would like to get 
rid of, or cut down at least to the required minimum--which would be a single 
line.


	David
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20071211/c6796466/attachment-0001.pgp