[asterisk-dev] Re: Kernic panic: Re: qwell: branch 1.2 r2434 - /branches/1.2/

[Tony Mountifield]

In article <462FA3F2.2040704 at digium.com>,
Kevin P. Fleming <kpfleming at digium.com> wrote:
> asterisk at ntplx.net wrote:
> 
> > This also screws up the good 1.4 branch. These changes look like trunk
> > stuff at best!
> 
> First, let me request once again for people to try to avoid using
> 'stable' as a label for our release branches. We maintain two release
> branches now so 'stable' is ambiguous at best, but it also causes users
> to assume that the code is perfect at all times, which it most certainly
> is not. Please use the term 'release branch' when referring to
> non-development branches :-)

This is fair enough, but the 1.2 branch, and mostly too the 1.4 branch
have always been stated as being for bug fixes only, not for new features.
Doesn't the pre-EC monitoring stuff count as a new feature?

Cheers
Tony
-- 
Tony Mountifield
Work: tony at softins.co.uk - http://www.softins.co.uk
Play: tony at mountifield.org - http://tony.mountifield.org